Sunday, 5th April 2026
Sunday, 5th April 2026

Bangladesh

Lack of Consensus Delays Signing of the ‘July Charter’

Khabor Wala Desk

Published: 31st July 2025, 2:05 PM

Lack of Consensus Delays Signing of the ‘July Charter’
Photo: Collected

Despite initial aims to finalise and sign the ‘National July Charter 2025’ within this month, the process has stalled due to continued disagreement among political parties on key reform proposals. Today, Thursday (31 July), being the last day of the month, the expected signature ceremony has been deferred, with major political factions yet to reach a consensus on several crucial issues within the draft charter.

The National Consensus Commission, which was formed six months ago to build a unified political reform framework, is now facing delays in finalising the document. The inability to reach agreement on at least eight fundamental reform proposals has prompted discussions around extending the commission’s mandate.

Reasons for Delay

The core dispute lies among BNP, Jamaat-e-Islami, and the Nationalist Citizens’ Party (NCP), who have expressed differing views on several of the proposed reforms. Sources indicate that a revised and consolidated draft will be presented in a fresh round of dialogue with political parties on Thursday at 10:30 AM.

Latest Developments

During the 22nd meeting of the National Consensus Commission, held on 30 July at the Foreign Service Academy in Dhaka, Professor Ali Riaz, the Vice-Chair of the Commission, stated:

“We are hopeful of presenting a unified and broadly acceptable draft today. Any feedback or objections must be submitted promptly so that discussions can move towards closure.”

How the Process Began

In October of last year, the interim government formed six reform commissions. After reviewing their recommendations, the National Consensus Commission sorted the proposals into two categories:

  • Immediately actionable administrative and legal reforms
  • Politically sensitive reforms requiring party consensus

The first group of reforms has already entered the implementation phase. However, discussions with political parties are still ongoing over 166 major recommendations.

Timeline of Dialogue

Phase Dates Participating Parties
First Phase 20 March – 19 May Individual party consultations
Second Phase From 3 June onwards Joint discussions
Total Participants 62 political parties/alliances

 

Areas of Consensus So Far

According to the commission, after 19 meetings over four months, consensus has been reached on 12 key issues, including:

Reform Area Agreement Status
Maximum tenure for Prime Minister (10 years) ✅ Agreed
Amendment to Article 70 of the Constitution ✅ Agreed
Reforms in parliamentary standing committees ✅ Agreed
Redrawing electoral boundaries ✅ Agreed
Revision of Presidential pardon powers ✅ Agreed
Decentralisation of the High Court ✅ Agreed
Relocation of lower courts to upazilas ✅ Agreed
Emergency powers declaration process ✅ Agreed
Procedure for appointing Chief Justice ✅ Agreed
Constitutional basis for Election Commission ✅ Agreed
Creation of an Independent Police Commission ✅ Agreed
Ban on dual roles for the Prime Minister ✅ Agreed

 

Outstanding Disputes

Despite progress, eight major reform areas remain unresolved even after two phases of dialogue:

Reform Proposal Status
Appointment process in four constitutional bodies ❌ Unresolved
Formation of an Upper House in Parliament ❌ Unresolved
Number and election method for reserved women seats ❌ Unresolved
Election process for the President ❌ Unresolved
Amendments to State Principles ❌ Unresolved
Structure of a Caretaker Government ❌ Unresolved
Presidential powers and responsibilities ❌ Unresolved
Legal status of the July Charter ❌ Debated

 

Views from Political Leaders

Wednesday’s discussions, which ran from 3:00 PM to 9:30 PM, focused on seven of the unresolved issues. While some progress was reportedly made on women’s representation, no final agreements were reached.

  • Salahuddin Ahmed, Standing Committee Member of BNP, remarked:

“Implementing reforms through ordinances is a positive step, but it’s crucial to debate whether an elected government would uphold them afterward.”

  • Dr Syed Abdullah Mohammad Taher, Jamaat’s Deputy Ameer, questioned the legitimacy of the process:

“If the July Charter lacks legal grounding, then the entire discussion is meaningless. Even under an interim government, this can be formalised through three mechanisms — legislation, public referendum, or plebiscite.”

  • Akhtar Hossain, Member Secretary of the NCP, issued a warning:

“If the charter is not announced by 31 July, we will initiate a united movement with all democratic forces to press our demands.”

Comments