Pre-Election Transaction and Transport Restrictions Spark Debate Over Pros and Cons

Ahead of the forthcoming election, a lively debate and criticism have emerged on social media regarding various restrictions imposed on financial transactions and transport services. In particular, limits on cash withdrawals through mobile financial services (MFS), controls on certain banking transactions, the suspension of motorbikes and ride-sharing services for specified periods, and restrictions on mobile phone use near polling stations have raised concerns. Many fear these measures could affect citizens’ ability to travel to polling centres and manage their finances during the voting period.

Some experts argue that, as part of election-related security arrangements, many countries impose temporary controls on financial and transport systems to prevent illicit money flows, violence, or other undesirable incidents. At the same time, they emphasise that ensuring public convenience and voter participation is equally important. Sudden restrictions on cash withdrawals or disruptions to transport, they warn, could create difficulties for voters from remote areas—particularly students and working professionals.

A number of university students have complained that they depend on funds sent by their families in order to travel back to their home constituencies to vote. If digital transactions or cash-out services are temporarily suspended, covering travel costs could become challenging. Likewise, the suspension of motorbikes and ride-sharing services may reduce options for quick travel across cities.

Officials associated with the Election Commission typically explain such decisions as part of strengthened security measures. According to them, these temporary steps are intended to prevent malpractice during voting, curb the movement of illicit funds, and ensure the safety of polling centres. However, discussions continue over how effective alternative arrangements will be in safeguarding public convenience.

A summary of the key measures under discussion is set out below:

Observers note that while ensuring election-time security is essential, it is equally important to guarantee that voters can reach polling stations with ease. Many therefore argue that future decisions of this nature should place greater emphasis on striking a careful balance between security considerations and citizens’ convenience.