Wednesday, 8th April 2026
Khabor Wala Desk
Published: 8th April 2026, 6:11 PM
A broad coalition of international human rights organisations has urged the Government of Bangladesh to retain and enact two landmark legal frameworks aimed at strengthening accountability and preventing enforced disappearances, warning that any move to repeal or dilute them would seriously weaken institutional independence and undermine protections for victims and their families.
In a joint statement issued on Wednesday (8 April), leading organisations including Human Rights Watch, CIVICUS, Article 19, International Federation for Human Rights, and several partner groups called on Dhaka to move swiftly to pass the National Human Rights Commission Ordinance 2025 and the Prevention of Enforced Disappearance Ordinance 2025.
The organisations warned that proposals to repeal the ordinances and later reintroduce them as fresh legislation could erode key safeguards already embedded within the current legal structure. They argued that the reforms represent a rare and significant opportunity to build a stronger, more independent human rights framework in Bangladesh, particularly in the context of recent political transition.
| Area | Key Reform Measure |
|---|---|
| Institutional independence | Enhanced protection for commissioners’ tenure and removal process |
| Investigative authority | Power to probe allegations involving security agencies |
| Detention oversight | Mandate to inspect prisons and detention facilities |
| Legal recognition | Enforced disappearance defined as a distinct criminal offence |
| Victim protection | Formal legal avenues for compensation and justice |
| Accountability reach | Expanded jurisdiction over state institutions |
The ordinances, introduced under the interim administration, significantly restructure the National Human Rights Commission by granting it expanded investigative authority, including the ability to examine allegations of abuse involving law enforcement and security agencies. They also empower the body to conduct independent inspections of detention facilities, a long-standing demand from rights advocates.
A central element of the reforms is stronger protection for commissioners against arbitrary dismissal, a provision intended to reinforce institutional autonomy and reduce political interference.
Equally significant is the Prevention of Enforced Disappearance Ordinance 2025, which formally recognises enforced disappearance as a distinct criminal offence under domestic law. This legal classification establishes structured remedies for victims and families, addressing a longstanding gap highlighted by both domestic campaigners and international observers.
According to figures cited by rights bodies, a Commission on Enforced Disappearances has documented 1,569 complaints of alleged disappearance and custodial abuse involving security personnel, with 287 individuals still unaccounted for. Advocates argue that a robust legal framework is essential to ensure independent investigation and accountability in such cases.
Human rights organisations expressed particular concern over reported proposals that could require the National Human Rights Commission to seek prior approval from government ministries before initiating investigations involving security forces. They also warned that allowing a government-dominated role in appointing commissioners could significantly weaken the body’s independence and public credibility.
The coalition stressed that any effective human rights institution must operate free from executive control, particularly when investigating allegations involving state agencies. Without such independence, they cautioned, accountability mechanisms risk becoming ineffective.
The organisations also urged a review of provisions within the disappearance legislation that include the death penalty, recommending alignment with international human rights standards and evolving global best practices.
The joint statement was endorsed by a wide alliance of international organisations, including:
The UATC network further includes the Association for the Prevention of Torture, the International Rehabilitation Council for Torture Victims, Omega Research Foundation, REDRESS, and the World Organisation Against Torture.
The organisations noted that Bangladesh’s current administration, in office for just over six weeks, is facing an early but significant test of its commitment to human rights reform. They argued that preserving and strengthening the ordinances would demonstrate a clear break from past shortcomings and signal alignment with international legal norms.
They concluded that the country now stands at a critical juncture, where legislative decisions will determine whether future accountability mechanisms are reinforced or weakened, with lasting implications for justice, transparency, and the protection of fundamental rights.
Comments