Khabor Wala Desk
Published: 16th January 2026, 12:52 AM
The streets of Dhaka have once again become the stage for a recurring drama of disruption. For Syed Abid Hussain Sami, a media professional residing in Azimpur, Wednesday was supposed to be a routine working day involving travel outside the capital. However, his plans met a grinding halt at the Shahbagh intersection. What is typically a manageable transit turned into a two-and-a-half-hour ordeal of absolute immobility.
The cause was a coordinated road blockade initiated by students from the “Seven Colleges.” Their demands are twofold: the immediate issuance of an ordinance to establish a dedicated university for their institutions and justice for their fellow student, Sakibul, who was recently murdered. By midday, protesters had occupied at least five of the city’s primary arterial roads, effectively paralysing the urban landscape.
The impact of these demonstrations extends far beyond mere inconvenience. As the city stood still, the friction between protesters and the public reached a boiling point. Social media was flooded with footage of heated altercations between stranded commuters—ranging from bus drivers to motorcyclists—and the student activists.
Perhaps most distressing was the plight of emergency services. “I personally witnessed at least twenty ambulances with their sirens wailing, trapped with nowhere to go,” Mr Sami recounted. This gridlock poses a direct threat to public safety, yet the protesters have issued warnings of continued blockades should their demands remain unmet.
Political analysts and observers note that while street protests are a historical staple of Bangladeshi activism, the frequency and intensity of blockades have surged under the current interim administration. This raises a critical question: why has the road become the primary tool for negotiation?
Experts point towards a perceived culture of “official apathy.” Many groups claim that they attempt to engage with the authorities through formal channels—letters, memorandums, and peaceful delegations—only to be met with silence. It is only when the economic and social heart of the city is throttled that the government appears to listen.
Common Triggers for Road Blockades in Dhaka (Jan 2026):
| Group | Primary Demand | Impact Zone |
|---|---|---|
| Seven College Students | Independent University Ordinance | Shahbagh / Nilkhet |
| Garment Workers | Arrears and Wage Increases | Gazipur / Mirpur |
| Job Aspirants | Age Limit Increase (35 Years) | Shahbagh / Science Lab |
| Local Residents | Utility Services (Gas/Water) | Various Neighbourhoods |
The responsibility for this “culture of blockades” is a subject of intense debate. If the government only responds to pressure, the public is incentivised to bypass dialogue in favour of disruption. Conversely, the unrestricted blocking of public thoroughfares infringes upon the fundamental rights of millions of citizens who are not party to the dispute.
Until a structured, responsive grievance redressal mechanism is established, the streets of Dhaka will likely remain a battlefield for competing interests, with ordinary citizens like Mr Sami caught in the perpetual crossfire.
Comments