Sunday, 5th April 2026
Sunday, 5th April 2026

World

Trump Threatens Use of Insurrection Act to Deploy More Troops in US Cities

Khabor Wala Desk

Published: 7th October 2025, 6:35 AM

Trump Threatens Use of Insurrection Act to Deploy More Troops in US Cities

President Donald Trump on Monday threatened to invoke emergency powers under the Insurrection Act to deploy additional troops into Democratic-led US cities, escalating tensions amid legal challenges to his current military mobilisations.

The Republican leader suggested that he would take action if necessary, following judicial interventions that have temporarily blocked troop deployments in some areas while permitting others to proceed.

Judicial Developments

City Federal Court Action Judge Outcome
Portland, Oregon Deployment of National Guard temporarily blocked Judge Karin Immergut (Trump appointee) Issued temporary restraining order; ruling being appealed by administration
Chicago, Illinois Deployment under review Judge April Perry (Biden appointee) Denied immediate restraining order; full hearing scheduled for Thursday

In Portland, a federal judge blocked the deployment of National Guard troops, ruling that the president’s justification “was simply untethered to the facts.” In Chicago, another judge allowed the deployment to continue for now but scheduled a full hearing later in the week.

Trump’s Statement

“We have an Insurrection Act for a reason. If I had to enact it I would do that,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office.
“If people were being killed and courts were holding us up or governors or mayors were holding us up, sure I would do that.”

Trump made the comments shortly after Democratic Governor JB Pritzker accused the president of creating pretextual chaos to justify military intervention in cities.

Political Backlash

Governor Pritzker reacted strongly to plans for Republican-led Texas to send 200 federalised National Guard troops to Illinois, saying: “They should stay the hell out of Illinois.”

Pritzker also criticised federal immigration agents for using “excessive force” and illegally detaining US citizens during raids in Chicago.

State Attorney General Kwame Raoul and city lawyers have filed a lawsuit alleging that Trump’s deployments are politically motivated: “The American people, regardless of where they reside, should not live under the threat of occupation by the United States military, particularly not simply because their city or state leadership has fallen out of a president’s favour.”

Raoul described the planned troop movements as “unlawful and unconstitutional, no matter where these forces come from.”

Federal Position

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem defended the deployment to Chicago, claiming the city was “a war zone.” Trump has similarly described Portland as “war-ravaged.”

The administration is appealing the Oregon ruling blocking troop deployment.

Public Opinion

A CBS poll released on Sunday found that 58 percent of Americans oppose deploying the National Guard to US cities.

Broader Context

This is not the first legal challenge to Trump’s domestic troop deployments. Earlier this year, California filed suit after troops were sent to Los Angeles to manage protests sparked by immigration enforcement actions. The case is still working its way through the courts.

Trump’s actions come amid nationwide protests against the mass deportation campaign targeting undocumented immigrants, with federal agents increasingly deployed to Democratic-led cities.

Comments