Why the Rush? A Deep Question at the Door of Sovereignty

On Monday, 17 November 2025, two long-term port-related agreements were signed at Hotel Intercontinental, sparking widespread debate across the country. On the surface, these agreements pertain to the management of Chattogram’s Laldia Container Terminal and Dhaka’s Pangaon Terminal. However, concerns have been raised over the transparency and process of these agreements. The larger question remains: why did an illegal, unconstitutional government, which seized power through a terrorist attack on 5 August under the pretext of organising elections, rush to sign such strategically and economically crucial agreements?

The Laldia Container Terminal has been assigned to Denmark’s APM Terminals for 30 years, while the Pangaon Terminal will be operated by Switzerland’s Medlog for 22 years. Economists, international experts, and the general public have strongly criticised the process.

Lack of Transparency: Allegations have emerged that these agreements were not subject to competitive bidding, but were conducted directly (G2G). This raises questions about transparency and whether the nation’s maximum economic benefit has been secured.

Abuse of Power: Questions arise regarding the limits of the illegal government’s authority. Critics argue that only an elected government, accountable to the people, has the mandate to make such long-term agreements.

Strategic Risk: Chattogram Port is not only a commercial hub but a critical strategic asset for Bangladesh. Assigning its management to foreign companies for such long periods raises concerns about national security and strategic interests.

Diversion Tactics:
The timing of the agreements has added to the controversy. The day coincided with the verdict against Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina. Critics believe the agreements were signed covertly while the nation’s attention was focused on the court ruling.

Subsequent events, including the demolition of Bangabandhu’s 32 Road house and the presence of police and military forces, have heightened public suspicion. Many view these actions as a deliberate attempt to distract the public from the port agreements.

The long-term transfer of management of a critical national port to foreign entities through an opaque process carries serious implications for Bangladesh’s sovereignty. The government must immediately disclose the full terms of these agreements to dispel public doubt. Otherwise, this rushed decision may be perceived as a conspiracy and an act against national interests.

SM Kamruzzaman Sagar
Producer, Organizer, Online Activist

Khaborwala/TSN