A writ petition has been filed in the High Court challenging the validity of the referendum held on 12 February and seeking the annulment of the results announced on 13 February.
On Tuesday, 17 February, Advocate A B M Ataul Majid Touhid, representing the public interest in the Supreme Court, submitted the petition. The legal challenge raises questions about the procedural conduct of the referendum, the announcement of its results, and the role of the authorities involved.
The petition requests the High Court to issue a rule asking why the referendum results should not be declared invalid. In addition, it seeks the annulment of the results announced on 13 February and any necessary directives the court may deem appropriate to ensure proper legal compliance.
The key points of the petition can be summarised as follows:
| Date | Event | Petition Focus |
|---|---|---|
| 12 February 2026 | Referendum conducted | Legality of the voting process questioned |
| 13 February 2026 | Results announced | Validity of results challenged |
| 17 February 2026 | Writ petition filed | Seeks annulment of results and judicial directives |
The writ petition underscores growing legal scrutiny over the referendum, reflecting concerns about transparency and adherence to established procedures. The High Court is now expected to examine the petition and decide whether to issue a rule for the authorities to respond, potentially setting the stage for further judicial review of the electoral process.
Observers note that the case could have significant implications for future referenda, as the court’s ruling may establish precedents regarding procedural fairness, authority accountability, and the legal framework governing nationwide votes.
