Sonali Bendre Faces Land Fraud Allegations

Former Bollywood actress Sonali Bendre and her husband Goldie Behl are embroiled in a legal dispute in Maval, Pune, following allegations of land fraud and regulatory violations. Local farmer Chandrakant Shinde has filed a complaint accusing the couple of irregularities concerning a 30-guntha plot of land. The matter is currently under consideration at the Vadhgaun Maval Civil Court in Pune.

The disputed land, covering approximately 32,000 square feet, has been at the centre of a protracted ownership conflict. Chandrakant Shinde claims that his family has held legal rights to the land since 1957. According to his complaint, Goldie Behl unlawfully registered the property in his name, undermining Shinde’s ancestral rights. The allegations extend to attempted illegal construction on the land and threats directed at the farmer’s family. Despite lodging complaints with local police, the farmer saw no resolution and ultimately approached the courts.

Sonali Bendre and her legal team have categorically denied all allegations. The actress asserts that her name does not appear on any official documents or property deeds related to the transaction, describing the claims as entirely baseless. Her lawyer added that Chandrakant Shinde had previously submitted multiple petitions to the Tehsildar and Sub-Divisional Officer, all of which were dismissed.

The administration is currently investigating the ownership and transactional details to determine whether any malpractice occurred. The court has scheduled the next hearing for 20 April 2026, where both parties’ arguments will be considered before a ruling is delivered. The outcome is awaited with keen interest, given the high-profile nature of the case.

The following table summarises key details of the case:

This case highlights the complexities of land disputes in India, especially when high-profile individuals are involved. Both sides await the court’s ruling, which will clarify the legality of the transaction and determine whether the farmer’s longstanding ownership claim will be upheld.

The forthcoming hearing is expected to draw attention from legal observers and the public, given the prominence of the individuals implicated and the potential precedent it could set for similar property disputes.