Khabor Wala Desk
Published: 7th April 2026, 7:28 PM
Former Bangladesh captain Aminul Islam Bulbul has declared himself the “only legitimate president” of the Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB), rejecting the newly formed ad-hoc committee led by former skipper Tamim Iqbal as “unconstitutional and illegal”. His remarks have intensified an already deepening governance crisis within Bangladesh cricket.
The statement follows the National Sports Council (NSC)’s announcement dissolving the existing BCB board and appointing an interim ad-hoc committee. In a strongly worded response issued on Tuesday (7 April), Bulbul also dismissed the NSC’s investigative findings, describing them as legally flawed and procedurally invalid.
The dispute has now produced competing claims over the leadership of Bangladesh’s cricket governing body, raising serious concerns about institutional stability ahead of key international fixtures and domestic planning cycles.
| Issue | Bulbul’s position | NSC / Ad-hoc committee position |
|---|---|---|
| BCB presidency | Declares himself “only legitimate president” | Board dissolved; interim committee formed |
| Ad-hoc committee | Declared unconstitutional and unlawful | Established under NSC directive |
| 2025 election | Fully valid, transparent, and binding | Under review by NSC investigation |
| Legal basis | ICC independence principles and constitution | State sports regulatory authority |
Bulbul defended the Bangladesh Cricket Board election held on 6 October 2025, insisting it was conducted in a transparent and constitutionally compliant manner.
He said the electoral process was overseen by a three-member commission chaired by senior Supreme Court advocate Mohammad Hossain. The panel also included Additional Inspector General of Police Sibgat Ullah and a former senior executive director of the National Sports Council.
According to him, objections concerning the inclusion of 15 clubs and the councillorship of Tamim Iqbal were resolved through quasi-judicial hearings conducted on 24 and 25 September 2025, prior to the election. As such, he argued that there is no legal basis to dispute the validity of the results.
Bulbul strongly criticised the NSC’s intervention, calling it “ultra vires” and politically driven. He alleged that the inquiry initiated under Youth and Sports Adviser Aminul Haque was intended to dismantle an elected board rather than address governance concerns.
He further argued that under the constitution of the International Cricket Council (ICC), member boards must operate independently without government interference. On this basis, he described the ongoing developments as a “constitutional coup” that threatens the autonomy of Bangladesh cricket administration.
The former captain rejected the legitimacy of the newly formed ad-hoc committee led by Tamim Iqbal, stating that his faction does not recognise its authority. He maintained that until the High Court delivers a final ruling, he remains the duly elected and lawful president of the BCB.
Expressing concern over the broader consequences of the dispute, Bulbul warned that continued instability could damage Bangladesh cricket’s international standing and erode investor confidence in the sport’s governance structure.
He also cautioned that prolonged uncertainty could disrupt player development pathways and hinder long-term planning for the national team.
Calling for urgent external involvement, he urged the International Cricket Council (ICC) to intervene, arguing that the situation poses a serious threat to the stability and independence of cricket governance in Bangladesh.
Earlier on the same day, Bulbul, accompanied by former Bangladesh wicketkeeper Khaled Masud Pilot, visited Bangladesh Cricket Board facilities in Purbachal. The visit was widely viewed as a symbolic demonstration of authority amid the escalating leadership dispute.
With rival factions now asserting parallel claims to legitimacy, Bangladesh cricket is facing an unprecedented administrative deadlock. As legal proceedings and institutional challenges loom, the outcome is expected to significantly influence the future governance structure of one of the country’s most prominent sporting bodies.
Comments