Khabor Wala Desk
Published: 4th May 2026, 11:10 AM
A peculiar family dispute has come before the Gwalior Bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court, drawing attention after two sisters jointly sought judicial intervention to exchange their respective husbands.
According to the case records, the matter originated from a habeas corpus petition filed by a man from Datia. He alleged that his wife and daughter had been unlawfully taken away by his brother-in-law. Acting on the petition, the High Court directed the police to produce the individuals named in the complaint, including the alleged abductors and the women concerned.
When the parties were produced before the court, the woman identified as the alleged “abductee” stated that she had left of her own free will to live with her sister’s husband. She further informed the court that she did not wish to return to her lawful husband, citing ongoing marital discord. It was also disclosed during proceedings that she had already initiated divorce proceedings against him.
In a further development, the second sister appeared before the court and made a similar statement. She expressed her unwillingness to continue living with her husband and declared her preference to remain with her sister’s husband instead. Both women, in their respective submissions, requested the court to facilitate an exchange of spouses between them.
As all parties involved were legally adults, the court observed that the dispute did not constitute a criminal matter of kidnapping or unlawful detention. Instead, it was categorised as a domestic and matrimonial disagreement arising within two consenting adults and families.
The Bench noted that such issues fall within the realm of personal relationships and mutual consent, and therefore may be resolved through discussion among the parties concerned rather than through criminal adjudication. The court emphasised that no coercion appeared to be involved based on the statements made before it.
Following these observations, the High Court dismissed the habeas corpus petition, bringing the proceedings to a close.
The unusual nature of the case has since become a subject of discussion in the local region, particularly due to the simultaneous appearance of both sisters in court expressing reciprocal marital preferences.
| Party | Description | Statement Before Court |
|---|---|---|
| Petitioner (Man from Datia) | Husband of one of the sisters | Alleged his wife and daughter were taken away by his brother-in-law |
| First Sister | Wife of petitioner | Stated she left voluntarily, prefers sister’s husband, divorce already filed |
| Second Sister | Wife of brother-in-law | Stated she does not wish to remain with her husband, prefers sister’s husband |
| Court (Gwalior Bench, Madhya Pradesh High Court) | Judicial authority | Treated matter as matrimonial dispute; dismissed habeas corpus petition |
Comments