Khabor Wala Desk
Published: 20th June 2026, 5:32 PM
A video capturing Madaripur-1 constituency Member of Parliament, Said Uddin Ahmed Hanjala, losing his temper and aggressively striking a table during a local arbitration meeting has gone viral across various social media platforms. The one-minute video recording depicts the lawmaker becoming highly agitated while issuing stern reprimands to a Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) activist and several other attendees present at the gathering. The widespread dissemination of the footage has sparked considerable discussion and varied criticism among the local residents of the upazila.
In the recently circulated footage, the Member of Parliament can be heard loudly questioning the attendees regarding their conduct during the formal proceedings. He audibly demands to know why they were speaking out of turn and why they chose to issue counter-arguments during the hearing. As the verbal exchange escalated, Hanjala forcefully struck the table before him and directed his speech specifically at the BNP activist, stating, “Be quiet, mister. I have come here to adjudicate. If any counter-argument is to be given, I will be the one to give it.”
According to verified reports from local sources, the arbitration meeting had been organised approximately one month prior to the video going viral. The tribunal was convened in Char Bachamara Moulvikandi village, located under the administrative jurisdiction of the Duttapara union within the Shivchar upazila. The high-level local meeting was arranged to settle a dispute stemming from a previous physical altercation involving two opposing local factions.
| Event Metric | Incident Documentation Details | Institutional / Local Context |
| Primary Subject | MP Said Uddin Ahmed Hanjala | Madaripur-1 Constituency Representative |
| Location of Hearing | Char Bachamara Moulvikandi Village | Duttapara Union, Shivchar Upazila |
| Origin of Conflict | Local physical altercation | Dispute occurred roughly one month prior |
| Video Duration | Exactly one minute | Captured lawmaker shouting and striking table |
| Current Case Status | Resolved through mutual arbitration | Confirmed by both the suspect and the victim |
Representatives from both disputing factions were physically present at the venue during the arbitration. As the formal proceedings advanced, heated arguments and intense debates broke out between the two groups regarding the delivery of speeches and the implementation of the proposed resolutions. The escalating verbal friction caused the general atmosphere inside the meeting venue to become visibly tense and volatile.
The viral video footage documents the moments when Member of Parliament Hanjala became visibly agitated by the procedural disorder. While shouting, he ordered several attendees to remain calm and strictly demanded that absolute discipline be maintained throughout the state-sanctioned judicial process. His action of hitting the table to assert his administrative authority has become the focal point of extensive online commentary and public debate across regional communication networks.
The BNP activist involved in the recorded exchange, identified locally as Tara Miah, confirmed the authenticity of the event but clarified the context of the timeline. Speaking on the matter, Tara Miah stated that the recorded incident took place approximately one month ago. He validated that a serious war of words had broken out between the opposing factions during the evaluation of the evidence. However, he emphasised that despite the brief period of high tension and aggressive posturing, the underlying dispute was subsequently resolved in a beautiful and peaceful manner for both parties.
When formally questioned regarding the controversial footage, Member of Parliament Said Uddin Ahmed Hanjala stated that the event occurred between one and one and a half months ago. He explained that a fierce argument was taking place between the two rival groups, which threatened the integrity of the meeting. The lawmaker asserted that his decision to reprimand the attendees and strike the table was done solely in the interest of regaining administrative control, restoring order, and ensuring that the arbitration process could be completed fairly. Hanjala concluded his remarks by maintaining that a successful and amicable resolution was ultimately achieved by the end of the session.
Comments