Khabor Wala Desk
Published: 17th February 2026, 5:46 AM
India’s music industry is currently engulfed in a heated legal dispute surrounding the work of internationally acclaimed composer and Oscar winner, A. R. Rahman. What began as a discussion on social media has escalated to the Supreme Court of India, raising complex questions about originality, intellectual property rights, and artistic ethics within the country’s musical landscape.
The lawsuit has been initiated by renowned classical musician Ustad Faiz Wasifuddin Sagar, who has petitioned the Supreme Court alleging that a segment of his composition, Shiv Stuti, was used without permission in the popular song Veer Raja Veer from the blockbuster film Ponniyin Selvan 2, which was composed by Rahman.
During the preliminary hearing, the bench led by Chief Justice Jaymaly Bagchi emphasised the importance of recognising original creators. The Chief Justice stated:
“It is crucial to identify the original creator. Singing a song does not equate to ownership. It must be proven whether the same melody pre-existed.”
Rahman’s legal representatives clarified:
“Our client does not claim ownership over another’s work. However, he asserts the rights to his own original creations.”
The court’s initial proceedings have focused on verifying the validity of the claim and establishing the evidence required to substantiate the allegations. The next hearing is scheduled for 20 February 2026, during which detailed musical comparisons and expert testimonies will play a pivotal role in determining the case’s outcome.
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Accused | A. R. Rahman |
| Complainant | Ustad Faiz Wasifuddin Sagar |
| Allegation | Plagiarism (unauthorised use of Shiv Stuti) |
| Disputed Song | Veer Raja Veer (Ponniyin Selvan 2) |
| Court | Supreme Court of India |
| Presiding Judge | Chief Justice Jaymaly Bagchi |
| Next Hearing | 20 February 2026 |
| Current Status | Investigation ongoing; debate intensifying |
Legal experts note that the case could set a significant precedent for resolving intellectual property disputes in Indian music, particularly regarding the recognition of rights in both classical and contemporary compositions.
Beyond the courtroom, the controversy has sparked broader public debate about artistic responsibility, the preservation of cultural heritage, and the ethical boundaries of creative expression. Musicians, fans, and cultural commentators are closely monitoring the proceedings, as the Supreme Court’s verdict may have lasting implications not only for Rahman’s illustrious career but also for the future standards of originality and copyright protection in India’s music industry.
Comments