Khabor Wala Desk
Published: 8th August 2025, 12:57 PM
A man from California is facing federal charges after allegedly stealing rare Chinese manuscripts from the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Library, replacing them with forgeries, and potentially exporting the originals to China. The value of the stolen works is estimated at $216,000, according to US officials.
Accused and Allegations
The accused, Jeffery Ying, aged 38 and a resident of Fremont, Bay Area, is alleged to have:
According to the US Department of Justice (DoJ):
“The library noticed that several rare Chinese manuscripts were missing, and an initial investigation revealed the books were last viewed by a visitor who identified himself as ‘Alan Fujimori’.”
Modus Operandi
The suspect’s methods appeared calculated and well-practised. Authorities say:
| Activity | Details |
| Fake Identity Use | Operated under aliases including “Alan Fujimori” |
| Library Access | Held multiple library cards under false names |
| Forgeries | Returned ‘dummy’ manuscripts in place of the originals |
| Evidence Found | Police found blank manuscripts, asset tags, and forgery materials during a hotel room search |
“Law enforcement also found pre-made labels known as asset tags associated with the same manuscripts that could be used to create ‘dummy’ books to return to the library in place of the original books.”
Importantly, UCLA’s policy prohibits the removal of rare or one-of-a-kind works from the premises. These materials may only be viewed under supervision within the library itself.
Legal Consequences
| Charge | Theft of a Major Artwork |
| Custody | Currently held in state custody |
| Maximum Sentence | 10 years in federal prison if convicted |
China’s Booming Art Market
The case is set against the backdrop of a rapidly expanding Chinese art market, where:
China is home to one of the world’s fastest-growing art markets, with collectors eager to reclaim artefacts linked to the nation’s imperial and scholarly past.
This case highlights the growing intersection of art theft, international trafficking, and cultural nationalism, and underscores the increasing sophistication of art-related crimes involving valuable antiquities.
Comments