Allegations have emerged claiming that the parliamentary seat of Hatia’s Member of Parliament, Abdul Hannan Masud, may be at risk following accusations that he submitted false information in his election affidavit. The claims were made by BNP leader Rashed Khan, who raised the issue in a verified post on social media on Monday, 15 June.
In his statement, Khan asserted that Masud had recently acknowledged during a television talk show that certain inaccuracies existed in his electoral affidavit. According to Khan, the MP allegedly admitted that incorrect declarations were included on legal advice, reportedly to simplify future business dealings and tax-related filings. Khan further questioned the authenticity of Masud’s declared assets, suggesting contradictions between public statements and affidavit disclosures.
The opposition politician also referenced past remarks attributed to Masud, in which he allegedly claimed financial difficulties, including borrowing money for personal expenses such as educational fees and construction materials. These claims were used by Khan to highlight perceived inconsistencies in the MP’s financial declarations.
Khan additionally cited provisions under Bangladesh’s electoral law, stating that submission of false information in affidavits can trigger post-election investigations by the Election Commission. If proven, such violations may lead to cancellation of candidacy and even loss of parliamentary membership.
Attempts were made by journalists to contact Abdul Hannan Masud for comment, but he did not respond to repeated phone calls.
Summary of Key Allegations and Claims
| Issue Raised | Claim by Rashed Khan | Reference Context |
|---|---|---|
| Affidavit accuracy | Alleged false information submitted | Social media post |
| Admission in talk show | Acknowledged inconsistencies | Television discussion (claimed) |
| Financial status | Reported contradictions in asset declarations | Previous public remarks cited |
| Legal implication | Risk of disqualification or seat cancellation | Election Commission rules cited |
| Official response | No comment from MP | Journalist contact attempts |
The controversy has added fresh political tension, with legal experts noting that affidavit-related disputes often require formal investigation before any administrative or parliamentary action can be taken. At present, no official statement has been issued by the Election Commission or any judicial authority confirming that proceedings have been initiated against the MP.
As the matter remains based on allegations circulated through social media and political commentary, its verification will depend on formal review by relevant regulatory bodies.
