Candidate Promises Paradise for Votes, Sparks Controversy

In a statement that has ignited widespread debate, A R Hafiz Ullah, the Jamaat-e-Islami candidate for Lakshmipur-4 (Ramgati-Kamolnagar) constituency, recently made a controversial remark linking voting preferences to religious reward. Speaking through a handheld microphone during a campaign event, he told voters: “If you vote in favour of Islam and uphold the Holy Qur’an, Paradise is guaranteed for you. Those who vote against the Qur’an will be sinful.”

A video of the speech circulating on social media shows Hafiz Ullah also criticising government welfare schemes, claiming that benefits such as widow allowances, senior citizen allowances, child benefits, maternity support, and disability stipends are not reaching the intended recipients. He stated: “One group is involved in corruption, while another has a history of malpractice. We assure you, as your sons and brothers, that no corruption will occur under our administration.”

The comments have provoked strong reactions, with many accusing the candidate of attempting to influence voters by exploiting religious sentiments. Responding to the backlash, Hafiz Ullah said: “I do not recall making such statements. Perhaps they were spoken inadvertently. Moreover, my words are sometimes presented out of context.”

Nilufa Yasmin, Upazila Executive Officer of Ramgati and Assistant Returning Officer, confirmed that the matter is under review. She noted: “If a formal written complaint is filed, it will be forwarded to the Returning Officer and necessary action will be taken.”

The key details of the incident are summarised below:

Political analysts have warned that leveraging religious sentiment to sway votes contravenes both the constitution and the electoral code of conduct. Experts emphasise that voters should receive accurate information and be able to exercise their franchise freely, without religious or personal pressure.

The episode has drawn heightened attention at both local and national levels, with citizens and election observers closely monitoring administrative measures to ensure the forthcoming election remains transparent and fair. The controversy has intensified calls for rigorous enforcement of electoral ethics and impartial oversight of campaign practices.